Logodaedalies

On this site and elsewhere:
A: A-Deism . Age of Endarkenment . aptonym, aptronym .
B: Besottism .
C: cdesign proponentsists . commentariat .
D: Denialism . Dog's Ass Plots .
E: Endarkenment (Age) .
F: Fistian (fundamentalist Christian aka evangelical Christian) .
G: groupuscules, groupustules .
H: Homo religioso .
I : IDiocy, IDiots . Infectious Repetitis .
J: jumbo-mumbo .
L: LAME thinking . leap blogging . lie-orama . Little Johnnyism and Little Kirkism . Luce-ifer's Apprentices .
M: magisterium . Misinformation Explosion Age . Misleading Pseudoscience for Dummies . Mysteria, mysterical .
N: Nac you seyee . New Atheism . New Credulity . NOMA .
P: pwn .
S: Sock Puppet .
W: Woo .

Bloopers .
Quotes .

Age of Endarkenment

David Colquhoun addresses the problem of intellectual dishonesty and fuzzy illogic in a Guardian Unlimited article entitled the age of endarkenment.

The past 30 years or so have been an age of endarkenment. It has been a period in which truth ceased to matter very much, and dogma and irrationality became once more respectable.

Colquhoun is author of the Improbable Science blog in which he expands upon his exposition of the reasons that we should be concerned about the "New Credulity.":

This matters when people delude themselves into believing that we could be endangered at 45 minutes' notice by non-existent weapons of mass destruction. . .
It matters when people are deluded into thinking that they will be rewarded in paradise for killing themselves and others. It matters when bishops attribute floods to a deity whose evident vengefulness and malevolence leave one reeling. And it matters when science teachers start to believe that the Earth was created 6,000 years ago.

In nations that value education and intellectuals, politicians who live down to the "average guy" image are not elected to the most powerful executive positions. As the world has recognized with disdain, Giorgio, purchased Ivy League degree or not, would not have appealed to voters in nations that respect merit. More particularly, Giorgio would not have appealed a second time to voters who were able to detect executive deceptions.